74
£12,500 which represents approximately the
total of freight charges plus 2% commission
Krhorn-Contin Railway
on the admitted chinese and (British section) and Chinese claims as revalued by the War Office, plus the claim for freight.
3. So far as the British Section's claim
is concerned, no difficulties arise over
Items 1 and 2 which are agreed at the figures claimed and The War Office have added two
further items which were not included, in the
claim and are shown m
the Lenched statement in Addl. Ilms
They are however unable to admit Item 3,
which, as it stands, includes an unspecified amount
for the manufacture of missing parts necessary for the fabrication of the 600 40-ton wagons,
materials for which were requisitioned from
the Chinese. It would appear from two telegrams
TNS/76308 and TNS/76307 of 26th June 1941
from C.in.C. Middle East to G.0.C. Hong Kong and
C. in. C. India respectively, copies of which I
attach, that instructions were given for the
manufacture of deficient material in Hong Kong,
(to love but that buffers and drawhooks were I made in
End 2+3
44 and 5
(copies of telegrams enclosed at
India where fabrication of the wagons was also to be
}
carried out. As you will see from the enclosure
سمنة
to a letter dated 16th October 1941 addressed by
sting King,
the War Supplies Board, to the Director-General of
Transportation at Cairo, a copy of which I attach,
it does not appear that in fact any significant
quantity of missing parts were manufactured in
er supplied from Hong Kong.
In these circumstances and in the abseneg
of other evidence in support of Item 3 of the
Lare prefered 5 British Section'e elaim, the War office/recommend
So for traced
The only evidence, deficient motivat by thrung Komp is
evolines there
Enel 4
(copy of letter evt. at (1))
ettlement
·(11)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.